Is it St Mungo's intention to harass us all the way to our court hearing against them on 20 February?
County Court at Central London, Royal Courts of Justice
What Civil Procedure Rule is this?
In preparation for the hearing of our case I have been informed that it is usually the applicant who takes responsibility for preparing a bundle for the court and for providing the defendant with a copy. This is to ensure that all documents that might be referred to during the hearing are easily available and referenced.
Declan's claim against the homeless charity St Mungo's under the Data Protection Act 1998 will take place on 20 February at the County Court at Central London. At the Preliminary Hearing on 11 October, Declan explained to the Court that had the false, fabricated and nonsensical data St Mungo's produced against us have gone unchallenged, we could have been evicted from our home (a threat to life). On 14 November Declan filed and served a fully narrated witness statement, as directed by the Court. Now St Mungo's want us to prepare a bundle for the court or they say they could do it for us with our participation, but they have yet to cite the rule in the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 that obliges us to proceed with such a bundle. Perhaps it is St Mungo's intention to harass us all the way to the court hearing. It is our stance that our next bundle in this case will be for the Court of Appeal, if St Mungo's plea for the Court to reject our claim is upheld.
Declan's Witness Statement dated 14 November 2016:
15 November 2016: Will St Mungo's get away with falsifying and fabricating data against us? I'm still waiting for Issuu to let me embed Declan's Witness Statement dated 14 November 2016
We were evicted from our previous flat on 14 March 2013 because according to our then live-in landlady's ex-husband, Dr Nigel McKenzie, a consultant psychiatrist in Highgate Mental Health Centre, our flat was needed for somebody with a mental illness. Former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler also lived with human rights activist Belinda McKenzie in the same political 'safe house' for a couple of years until 2007. According to BBC Panorama, Shayler "caused the biggest crisis of official secrecy since the spy catcher affair"; he was jailed for seven weeks in 2002 for breaking the Official Secrets Act. It is indeed unfortunate that Shayler declared himself the Messiah in 2007, became a squatter, and was subsequently ridiculed in the press for changing his name to Delores Kane. A New Statesman article published in September 2006 featuring Shayler and Belinda gives no indication that Shayler believed he was the Messiah at that time; whilst a Daily Mail interview with him the following year reveals he believed himself to be Jesus by June 2007. He has never regained his normal self.
*On 2 May 2013, Issuu removed this pdf from my Issuu account following a copyright complaint by Hearst Communications. I had uploaded the article to my Issuu account in December 2012. In March 2013, when last I checked, the article had been viewed more than 15,000 times. It can be read here.
BBC PANORAMA: The David Shayler Affair (August 1998)
Former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler "caused the biggest crisis of official secrecy since the spy catcher affair", according to BBC Panorama. He was jailed for seven weeks in 2002 for breaking the Official Secrets Act.